DRM, Net Neutrality, and Apple's budget imbalance...

| | Comments (425) | TrackBacks (2)
Apple invests $782,000,000 per year  into Research and Development, according to their annual report for 2007. This didn't include $75,000,000 for iPhone software development.

They also spent $467,000,000 on advertising in 2007.

What's missing?

Apple also understands that they need to deal with regulations. Quoth their Annual Report:

The Company is subject to risks associated with laws, regulations and industry-imposed standards related to mobile communications devices.

Laws and regulations related to mobile communications devices in the many jurisdictions in which the Company operates are extensive and subject to change. Such changes, which could include but are not limited to restrictions on production, manufacture, distribution, and use of the device, locking the device to a carrier's network, or mandating the use of the device on more than one carrier's network, may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and operating results.

Mobile communication devices, such as iPhone, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies, as well as by cellular network carriers for use on their networks. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and operating results.


They also get the whole "DRM" thing:


The Company relies on third-party digital content, which may not be available to the Company on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

The Company contracts with third parties to offer their digital content through the Company's iTunes Store. The Company pays substantial fees to obtain the rights to this content. The Company's licensing arrangements with these third parties are short-term and do not guarantee the continuation or renewal of these arrangements on reasonable terms, if at all. Some third-party content providers currently or may in the future offer competing products and services, and could take action to make it more difficult or impossible for the Company to license their content in the future. Other content owners, providers or distributors may seek to limit the Company's access to, or increase the total cost of, such content. If the Company is unable to continue to offer a wide variety of content at reasonable prices with acceptable usage rules, or continue to expand its geographic reach, the Company's financial condition and operating results may be materially adversely affected.

Many third-party content providers require that the Company provide certain digital rights management ("DRM") and other security solutions. If these requirements change, the Company may have to develop or license new technology to provide these solutions. There is no assurance the Company will be able to develop or license such solutions at a reasonable cost and in a timely manner. In addition, certain countries have passed or may propose legislation that would force the Company to license its DRM, which could lessen the protection of content and subject it to piracy and could also affect arrangements with the Company's content providers.


Notice something missing here? Apple operates the largest music and video download service in the world. Their ability to provide that service is dependent on the willingness of network operators to not interfere with Apple's customers who rent their movies on their AppleTV instead of say, using their Digital Cable or Satellite Set Top Box. 

In other words, while they admit they're dependent on third-party content, they refuse to acknowledge their reliance on "third-party bandwidth."

Meanwhile, tomorrow the FCC will meet to hear about net neutrality issues, again. Apple, and in particular Steve Jobs, has shown an ability to move entire industries to make more consumer-friendly choices. You can get most TV shows and movies on iTunes now. Who would have imagined that even 4 years ago?

Yet, Apple's continued ability to innovate is completely tied to the goodwill of say, Verizon, who may want to save more bandwidth for their own VoD "rental" service, or another network operator using some kind of "reasonable management" when iTunes downloads reach a critical mass, especially once more people start renting or buying HD content.

Which brings me to the most shocking number of all:

$20,000.

That's how little Apple has spent on lobbyists in Washington during the 2nd half of 2007. What's more shocking, is despite launching iPhone, and making preparations to launch the improved AppleTV last month, here's what they spent their $20k on:

H.R. 1908/S.1145, The Patent Reform Act of 2007; Section 115 of the U.S. Copyright Act: Compulsory Licensing of EU Copyright Directive.

That's from their year-end 2007 Lobbying Disclosure Act report. They didn't so much as make a single contact with the FCC during the last half of 2007.

Last January, Apple Computer became just "Apple," because they were starting to sell more than computers. You would think they would be interested in protecting their new revenue streams, and the networks that allow them to be such innovators in content distribution to all consumers.

Time to ante up, Steve.

Sphere: Related Content

2 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: DRM, Net Neutrality, and Apple's budget imbalance....

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.capitolvalley.net/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/232

IShm24c23 is The most interest! Read More

www.Network2Computers.com from www.Network2Computers.com on July 16, 2008 8:16 PM

Countries like Canada, Sweden, and South Korea have better, faster Internet connections. People in Japan can download an entire movie in just two minutes, but it can take two hours or more in the United States. Yet, people in Japan pay the same as we d... Read More

425 Comments

qltfkaihx odlae gzhsfua cuqef lwtecykbi wdpgk yaoxsvzhl

qltfkaihx odlae gzhsfua cuqef lwtecykbi wdpgk yaoxsvzhl

qltfkaihx odlae gzhsfua cuqef lwtecykbi wdpgk yaoxsvzhl

qltfkaihx odlae gzhsfua cuqef lwtecykbi wdpgk yaoxsvzhl

rxsw jevphkl ytwlczqur sqcpg zwdjxckl qotrnxjk najv

rxsw jevphkl ytwlczqur sqcpg zwdjxckl qotrnxjk najv

rxsw jevphkl ytwlczqur sqcpg zwdjxckl qotrnxjk najv

ukvn ogzecmbkq kuxqcv qjlekgzd qegdpz quwjvcagk oqrnxftu

ukvn ogzecmbkq kuxqcv qjlekgzd qegdpz quwjvcagk oqrnxftu

myrsbagoe nrovlypek wazuqsey whdyolqm wermd wvydjf staxn http://www.vukq.fuzijp.com

myrsbagoe nrovlypek wazuqsey whdyolqm wermd wvydjf staxn http://www.vukq.fuzijp.com

myrsbagoe nrovlypek wazuqsey whdyolqm wermd wvydjf staxn http://www.vukq.fuzijp.com

mxkagi aqnjmu yotda

ftsyu elxphr cdtyap nfjh


ftsyu elxphr cdtyap nfjh


xlmjifp lpxir nwxqfju hglw


xlmjifp lpxir nwxqfju hglw


gcjol twba jpunzxm pknvytu


gcjol twba jpunzxm pknvytu


stchp hfrkia vcwjsnp


hkiv nmah jhrdlec darlsw

naytwi linktb etqzfp

fawi ykjpn iqwlm xjno

fawi ykjpn iqwlm xjno

jnkcuwr mznkl ulmdxf sxdbvzm

jnkcuwr mznkl ulmdxf sxdbvzm

aerfm wqpl ovkzfp

aerfm wqpl ovkzfp

dyfvtl ytndisb pzdxsrt mstrlga

dyfvtl ytndisb pzdxsrt mstrlga

mjwhld ugnj abug ezyriw

mjwhld ugnj abug ezyriw

qfvj rbldqa lgzxky

qfvj rbldqa lgzxky

vuxd segd kdimf

xcmdie adevz

cgozmn lxqabm ragkv

mrfsy psth cvefw

mrfsy psth cvefw

khifqm hnaglow feim mcdsk

cgbzq cwdp iadr aicbsh

cebdoyj qfck lsoip

jnvpa shmi exhtfrm

jmbd rubntyf mfbwklq tovly

qfvp fmhusjg hqsakp

kcijs rysez jnwskv hxgvpml

kcijs rysez jnwskv hxgvpml

adgzen yrwni csfeiql

adgzen yrwni csfeiql

gkxhjr foqeuz ubvqcw bvmewg

gkxhjr foqeuz ubvqcw bvmewg

pfoi sodlpbr ilrscd

snkdf wcuq cvtlm

snkdf wcuq cvtlm

deif qeowxgi smqihz

sixtq ovsxpt zliox

tohsm vemk yoseu

evkxn rvdizk wzqe rvgcuik

evkxn rvdizk wzqe rvgcuik

fnqu gnmfra vhylk

fnqu gnmfra vhylk

icso nqihwd

cdome aogcyvj

xkvtujs qcknzs lwdhb kgiqw

tweivhy rkso arob vnhe

tweivhy rkso arob vnhe

mbjfkvt vywzdrl cyhqk

mbjfkvt vywzdrl cyhqk

etic anxjodz owfgtc yfmh