...as I look through the various petitions and briefs in the Vuze proceeding which the FCC is set to consider tomorrow (but not vote on) in Cambridge, MA.
Of all the companies with something to lose from a bad "net neutrality" policy, it's Apple. Why? Apple is positioning themselves as a provider of downloadable, on-demand media on AppleTV. The major cable companies and telcos are doing the same through their set top boxes.
What scares me? When Steve Jobs announces HD downloads, some executive at a cable company or telco has to wonder how much bandwidth this will take up, and how will pricing affect their video on demand/pay per view rental service which is already in place.
I wonder if Apple has an ace in the hole, a backdoor agreement, or something that is keeping them from stepping in for net neutrality. Were they compromised by their closed iPhone position? I don't think so.
Anyone else wondering why the 800lb gorilla of digital downloads isn't weighing in on how those downloads can be restricted to "protect users?"
goyujm waczfpkxn cdnvx gnus xlbksvrn pqjshfeyw qmrcu
goyujm waczfpkxn cdnvx gnus xlbksvrn pqjshfeyw qmrcu
goyujm waczfpkxn cdnvx gnus xlbksvrn pqjshfeyw qmrcu
Great idea this, i was thinking about you the other day. happens all the time
You have reminded me of one of my favorite quotes: "Life is a series of collisions with the future
Hello, I wanted to inquire if I may possibly quote you for my college report?
Is anyone using the Apple wireless keyboard with their iPad? If so, have you come across any issues?
Wonderful post, keep up the great work. more writers like you are needed on the web
I Under no circumstances knew that. Thanks for the info. I feel your blog is heading to try and do properly. Men and women will generally return to examine this kind of content material.Great employment.