I'm going to give them another chance to tell me what happened to their "export contacts" feature and just come clean. Then I'm going to start talking about something I'm going to start using in the daily content here. It's a really cool technology.The opening of social networks may now accelerate thanks to that older next big thing, web-mail. As a technology, mail has come to seem rather old-fashioned. But Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft and other firms are now discovering that they may already have the ideal infrastructure for social networking in the form of the address books, in-boxes and calendars of their users. "E-mail in the wider sense is the most important social network," says David Ascher, who managesThunderbird, a cutting-edge open-source e-mail application, for the Mozilla Foundation, which also oversees the popular Firefox web browser.
That is because the extended in-box contains invaluable and dynamically updated information about human connections. On Facebook, a social graph notoriously deteriorates after the initial thrill of finding old friends from school wears off. By contrast, an e-mail account has access to the entire address book and can infer information from the frequency and intensity of contact as it occurs. Joe gets e-mails from Jack and Jane, but opens only Jane's; Joe has Jane in his calendar tomorrow, and is instant-messaging with her right now; Joe tagged Jack "work only" in his address book. Perhaps Joe's party photos should be visible to Jane, but not Jack.
This kind of social intelligence can be applied across many services on the open web. Better yet, if there is no pressure to make a business out of it, it can remain intimate and discreet. Facebook has an economic incentive to publish ever more data about its users, says Mr Ascher, whereas Thunderbird, which is an open-source project, can let users minimise what they share. Social networking may end up being everywhere, and yet nowhere.
Facebook still won't answer my question...maybe they'll respond to The Economist?
Yes, that magazine has noticed what I've been pointing out for a while, that your data on Facebook is theirs for the purpose of selling it to third parties, and they don't want you to have it back.
I've repeatedly contacted them about the "where did the CSV export feature go?" issue and gotten silence, but now even The Economist has noticed that they keep you on the site to keep you looking at the data, and the ads.
It's going to let you interact with us in more ways than comments. It does everything Facebook does, but with more privacy and respect for the user. It's really, really cool and I'm a big believer in it.
Wait.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Facebook still won't answer my question...maybe they'll respond to The Economist?.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.capitolvalley.net/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/455



Leave a comment