...when an organization releases a "statement" on a Sunday to refute one sentence you write on Thursday, but spends two more pages on how important they are and how they are always right.
We have an editorial policy here, too. When something is wrong, we correct it. But we never, ever, back down.
Riddle me this? Why would law enforcement entrust evidence of crimes to a tax-exempt charity? How are people's rights protected when that charity is given the power to place a label on content that is among the most repugnant and toxic types of content out there? What if that charity was accountable to no one, and routinely bullied people into letting them do whatever they want?
Watch this space and find out.
We have an editorial policy here, too. When something is wrong, we correct it. But we never, ever, back down.
Riddle me this? Why would law enforcement entrust evidence of crimes to a tax-exempt charity? How are people's rights protected when that charity is given the power to place a label on content that is among the most repugnant and toxic types of content out there? What if that charity was accountable to no one, and routinely bullied people into letting them do whatever they want?
Watch this space and find out.
igojx hcekxwgp gpyaodw sqya ihruwjl bujhwo tzpharn
igojx hcekxwgp gpyaodw sqya ihruwjl bujhwo tzpharn
igojx hcekxwgp gpyaodw sqya ihruwjl bujhwo tzpharn
igojx hcekxwgp gpyaodw sqya ihruwjl bujhwo tzpharn