Recently in Media Category

Was that headline provocative enough for you? Are you reading? Good! I'm going to let you in on a secret...

...there is NO SUCH THING as "Citizen Journalism."

Do I have to repeat myself? I'll say it one more time.

There is NO SUCH THING as "Citizen Journalism."

Good. Now I've really got your attention. Please keep reading.

The web allows anyone to publish anything, pretty much at any time, on any subject. With some SEO voodoo, it can even get to a good place in search results.

Cheap video and still digital cameras, broadband, and the advent of blogging have brought about this idea of "citizen journalism," presumably to report the "real" stories that get ignored by "mainstream media." Many bloggers have assumed this mantle of "citizen journalist," and some sites like The Uptake have embraced the idea of publishing firsthand reporting by Joe Sixpack, as Sarah Palin would say. Some sites take this further, like the "collaborative journalism" of NowPublic. CNN has had an "iReport" site that posts "citizen journalists'" clips, reports, and other snippets.

This isn't neccesarily a bad thing. I have no formal training in journalism, and I think the more people out there who are reporting on events, the better.

But I do think the idea of "citizen journalism" needs to be abandoned, for good. Heck, I even hate the word "blogger," especially when describing people like Josh Marshall, who won a Polk Award (for journalism) based on his Talking Points Memo work on the US Attorney scandal.

I've covered events, Congressional hearings, and other issues as an independent writer and on behalf of other organizations. I haven't always gotten paid. But I've never called myself a "citizen journalist."

On the other hand, I do think that when I do these things, I am practicing journalism. Not citizen journalism, just journalism.

If you report on, provide informed analysis or document events for the benefit of an audience in a true and accurate manner, that's journalism. It's ok, in my opinion, to have a slant or to call out untruths when you see them. Some people think that reporting requires you to get someone to tell you 2+2=4. I'm not so sure I always agree. Facts are facts, and obvious facts are...obvious.

But when you're reporting a breaking story that isn't a widely known fact, you should be checking on the veracity of the story. That means sending emails, making phone calls, or getting off your butt and talking to people, BEFORE you publish. Publishing untruths, like the idiot who told the world (erroneously) that Steve Jobs had a heart attack, is not only irresponsible, but it's not journalism. It's rumour-mongering.

Calling it "citizen journalism" and holding it to a lower standard is nothing but a cop-out. Journalism is not a licensed profession, like law or medicine. But it is similar in that it has some fundimental ethical principles that journalists follow:

• Don't publish things that aren't true.
  
• Check your sources. Check them twice. If you're not sure, don't publish. Being right is better than being first and wrong.
• Ask questions. Be skeptical. Don't be a mouthpiece.
  
• Avoid conflicts, or disclose them fully and prominently. Kara Swisher has been a shining beacon on this front. Read her disclosure statements. They are easy to find, candid, and leave nothing to question, unlike some other tech bloggers. I respect Michael Arrington, but having a subordinate write about a company you have a stake in is not good enough.
  

This is what Kara has to say about investments:

I have investments in several group funds, which are managed without my input primarily by an investment bank, and they might from time to time put my money into funds that buy shares of stock in the companies I write about. But I do not have any knowledge about when they buy and sell any shares. I also have several general stock-index mutual funds related to my former employment at Dow Jones, but none is specifically technology-focused, although any one might, from time to time, acquire shares in some technology companies I write about. In this case, as with all my investments, I also have no knowledge of when they buy and sell any shares.

Anyway, considering what happened to Apple's stock Friday, I will continue to be highly skeptical of anyone who invests in companies that they or their subordinates write about. Arrington has a reputation for firing people for linking to other tech blogs. How do you think he'd handle a negative review of one of his investments?

"Citizen Journalism" does not exist. There is good journalism, and there is bad journalism. Whether you are paid or not is not at issue. The issue is how you go about doing it.

If your house catches fire, the people who put it out may be volunteers, or they may get paid. But they still go into burning buildings, and they all have the same commitment to doing it right.

Think about it.

New York's WNBC has this stupidity:

Tomorrow, I'm going to tackle this in detail, but here's the real story. This television "journalist" probably did less research for this segment than the reporters that uncovered John Edwards' affair. Over and over again, you see the same idiotic sound-biting and fearmongering. Second Life is simply the newest target.

I wonder how long it will be before Linden Lab signs "voluntary" agreements with 48 separate attorneys general to monitor Second Life for boogeymen...

Here we go again.
 

But I will give a shout-out to Mark 'rizzn' Hopkins (of Mashable fame). He and I exchanged some words the other day over whether or not one of his posts was appropriate for a "serious" tech blog.

We may agree to disagree on some things. I won't go into the substance.

But some things I said and the context they were said with other people's comments made him rather angry. He posted a video rant about it. That's ok, I can take it. But I exchanged some emails with him last night and it appeared we had been talking past each other.

And today he posted an update, an apology of sorts. He didn't have to do that.

But he did. That's more than many bloggers will do, and even many newspapers - publish a correction or clarification with same prominence of the original material. It's a weakness of many media outlets. One of my favorite practices of some bloggers is to strike out things in place
and put corrected language in.

What Mark did was real, and public, and honest. And as much as I respected him before, that respect has been multiplied. He says he's going to be writing on blogging versus journalism and the state of media today, and I can't wait to find out what he has to say.

Some folks might be shocked by this report that says Blogs have passed traditional Newspapers and Magazines in popularity on Google Trends.

What's shocking? There are those who say that Video Killed the Radio Star but the shocking reality is that many of the old "Radio Stars" were able to make the transition to Television based on their talent alone. 
Look at the graph. While magazines have dropped precipitously, newspapers and blogs haven't so much crossed paths as converged. 
Either way, what's the big deal? What's the story? Most of the major papers have been updating their websites around the clock anyway. What we call "blogs" are just content management systems containing written and embedded content, which can be either good or awful. I'm not talking about all the vanity ones and livejournals out there, I'm talking about the ones that break stories, or provide things that aren't available anywhere else. 
Example: Joshua Michael Marshall's Talking Points Memo won a Polk Award this year, for excellence in Journalism (specifically his reporting on the U.S. Attorney scandal).  
Journalism and reporting aren't static. The business is about getting the story, getting it right, and getting it first, no matter what. The "stars" aren't going to get killed, they'll just perform on a different stage. Jack Benny was a star in Vaudeville, Radio, Film, and Television. 
Entertainment and News aren't so different. The "stars" have the same thing in common: Content, Content, Content. 
Whether you call it a newspaper or a blog doesn't matter. Whether it gets you what you need to know, when you need to know it, does. 
So what's the big deal?