<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Capitol Valley</title>
        <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/</link>
        <description>Views on technology and public policy from both coasts. We have 27 hours in our day.</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 07:06:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>The reason it&apos;s been so quiet...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[...at least on my end, has been that I have been without a functioning computer for the past 48 hours.<br /><br />Because I followed the manufacturer's instructions.<br /><br />I normally use a MacBook Pro, my third Apple laptop, purchased to replace a PowerBook G4, which replaced another PowerBook G4, which replaced a Linux desktop.<br /><br />The MBP was purchased on January 9th. Five months to the day, I installed a firmware update that the Software Update application would not stop telling me to install. When I rebooted...it didn't reboot. No chime, nothing. When I called support, they had me burn a "Firmware Restoration CD" on my old Powerbook, which thankfully works fine with an external keyboard and monitor. Nothing.<br /><br />I'll be trying to get my data off the machine, because Apple will deny the problem was caused by their update, attribute it to a bad logic board, and do a warranty replacement, which will take too long during a time when I need a laptop. So, I'll probably be going back to Linux.<br /><br />Thanks, Apple. <br /><br /><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/the-reason-its-been-so-quiet.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/the-reason-its-been-so-quiet.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Apple</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Bad Support</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">apple</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FAIL</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FAIL FAIL FAIL</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">firmware update</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">logic board</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">macbook pro</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">macbrick pro</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">weapons grade FAIL</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 07:06:17 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Bill Gates&apos; latest invention...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[...is pretty creepy. The "Guardian Angel," described here<a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=%2220080082465%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20080082465&amp;RS=DN/20080082465"> in this Patent application,</a> claims to be able to pretty much run your life.<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>I can't describe why. Just read it.</div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/bill-gates-latest-invention.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/bill-gates-latest-invention.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Microsoft</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">creepy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">guardian angel</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">microsoft</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">patents</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 22:47:06 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Outsourcing finally hits lawyers...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://washingtonpost.com">Washington Post</a> (which has outsourced some of its' tech news to TechCrunch as of this week) <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/10/AR2008051001517.html?hpid=moreheadlines">reports</a> that the days of law school grads landing the $150,000 jobs drafting contracts at megafirms may be in jeopardy due to outsourcing, just as tech folks saw their jobs move to India years ago. <div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px; "><p>GURGAON, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/countries/india.html?nav=el" target="" style="color: rgb(12, 71, 144); text-decoration: underline; ">India</a> -- When Aashish Sharma graduated from law school two years ago, his father had visions of seeing him argue in an Indian court and eventually become an honorable judge.</p><div id="body_after_content_column"><p>Instead, Sharma, 25, now sits all day in front of a computer in a plush, air-conditioned suburban office doing litigation research and drafting legal contracts for U.S. companies and law firms. He is part of a booming, new outsourcing industry in India that employs thousands of English-speaking lawyers such as him to do legal work at a small fraction of the cost of hiring American lawyers.</p></div></span></blockquote>Imagine that. The explosion of litigation costs and the massive volume of electronic information involved in today's court cases, has overwhelmed the market for affordable attorneys and paralegals, according to the Post. Instead, that electronic information can be shifted around the world and done overnight so when the $800/hour partner comes in the next morning, the task of analyzing, cataloging and researching is done for a pittance compared to what it would cost to pay experienced American paralegals to work overnight. <blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><br /></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px; ">"Ninety percent of a lawyer's work is legal research and drafting, and all this can now be offshored to India," said Russell Smith, who worked in a Manhattan law firm called SmithDehn before moving to India to set up an outsourcing company in 2006. "A large portion of our fees in the U.S. is because of office rent. It is often a big decision to hire one attorney in the U.S. In India, we can hire 10 at a time and train them all at once."</span></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></span></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px;"><p>Smith's Indian company, SDD Global Solutions, handled much of the legal work for the film "Borat." Other clients include the Washington-based firm Appleton &amp; Associates and U.S. movie studios and television networks.</p><div id="body_after_content_column"><p>"My people in India can do everything from here, except sign the opinion letter and appear in an American court," he said.</p><p><br /></p></div></span></blockquote><div><div>Indeed, this means that the glut of law school graduates being produced by American law schools are going to have to do more to distinguish themselves in an already cutthroat marketplace, since it's now been proven that the strategy can make an attorney's case even stronger and possibly reduce the number of nuisance lawsuits that companies pay to settle rather than fight. For example:</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 17px; ">Smith's Indian office recently researched and drafted the motion papers for the dismissal of a libel case against the producers of HBO's "Da Ali G Show." Smith said that if it had not been for the cheaper option of outsourcing, the producers would have settled.</span></blockquote><br />Imagine the consequences for the American legal system if every party had the resources to prepare for trial rather than weigh the costs of arguing their case successfully, and then the likelihood of recovering fees against the cost of a settlement.<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>We might see fewer lawsuits. Imagine that. Tort Reform via Outsourcing.</div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/outsourcing-finally-hits-lawye.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/outsourcing-finally-hits-lawye.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Economy</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ali g show</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">borat</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">courts</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">india</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">law</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">lawsuits</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">outsourcing</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">washington post</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:18:12 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Bon Jovi on Blogs, Newspapers, &quot;New Media&quot;</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy'; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">"It's all the same...only the names have changed..."</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: -editor-proxy;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></span></div>Some folks might be shocked by <a href="http://www.labnol.org/internet/blogging/blogs-popular-than-newspapers-magazines-google-trends/3242/">this report</a> that says Blogs have passed traditional Newspapers and Magazines in popularity on Google Trends. <div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><center><img src="http://www.labnol.org/wp/images/2008/05/newspapers-blogs.png" /></center><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /><center style="text-align: left;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></center><center style="text-align: left;">What's shocking? There are those who say that <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=6LB6Q_oycfQ">Video Killed the Radio Star </a>but the shocking reality is that many of the old "Radio Stars" were able to make the transition to Television based on their talent alone. </center><center style="text-align: left;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></center><center style="text-align: left;">Look at the graph. While magazines have dropped precipitously, newspapers and blogs haven't so much crossed paths as converged. </center><center style="text-align: left;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></center><center style="text-align: left;">Either way, what's the big deal? What's the story? Most of the major papers have been updating their websites around the clock anyway. What we call "blogs" are just content management systems containing written and embedded content, which can be either good or awful. I'm not talking about all the vanity ones and livejournals out there, I'm talking about the ones that break stories, or provide things that aren't available anywhere else. </center><center style="text-align: left;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></center><center style="text-align: left;">Example: Joshua Michael Marshall's <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com">Talking Points Memo</a> won a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polk_Award">Polk Award</a> this year, for excellence in Journalism (specifically his reporting on the U.S. Attorney scandal).  </center><center style="text-align: left;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></center><center style="text-align: left;">Journalism and reporting aren't static. The business is about getting the story, getting it right, and getting it first, no matter what. The "stars" aren't going to get killed, they'll just perform on a different stage. Jack Benny was a star in Vaudeville, Radio, Film, and Television. </center><center style="text-align: left;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></center><center style="text-align: left;">Entertainment and News aren't so different. The "stars" have the same thing in common: Content, Content, Content. </center><center style="text-align: left;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></center><center style="text-align: left;">Whether you call it a newspaper or a blog doesn't matter. Whether it gets you what you need to know, when you need to know it, does. </center><center style="text-align: left;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></center><center style="text-align: left;">So what's the big deal?</center><center style="text-align: left;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></center><center style="text-align: left;"> </center><div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/bon-jovi-on-new-media.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/bon-jovi-on-new-media.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Media</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">bon jovi</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">google trends</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">journalism</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">media</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">polk award</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">talking points memo</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 16:41:57 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>&quot;It&apos;s to protect the customer...&quot;</title>
            <description><![CDATA[In an attempt to do something cool, I purchased a Nokia N95 from TigerDirect earlier today. They've been good to be in the past and have great deals. <div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>I'm never doing business with them again.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>A few hours after I placed the order, I got a call from a "representative" asking me for personal information, and based upon that, a bunch of questions that required me to confirm information such as street names I have lived on years ago, former coworkers at past employers, and other data mining gems that are just plain creepy.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>When I voiced my concern to the TigerDirect support person, I was told "it's to protect the customer against fraud...it's all public information, anyway..."</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Come on, don't lie to me. If I had fraudulent charges on my credit card, couldn't I just call my credit card company? I've done it before, and it hasn't been a problem. </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>The real reason is their own loss prevention. If the way they keep prices low is by buying mined data and invading my privacy, I'll pay a few more dollars to not be creeped out.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/its-to-protect-the-customer.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/its-to-protect-the-customer.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Buyer&apos;s Remorse</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">data mining</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">epic fail</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">loss prevention</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">retail</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">tigerdirect</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:02:20 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Michael Arrington is no Carl Bernstein...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[...but it's a start.<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>As of today, <a href="http://washingtonpost.com">The Washington Post</a> is going to be syndicating <a href="http://techcrunch.com">TechCrunch</a><div>headlines and stories in their <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/technology/index.html">Technology section.</a> </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>The Post has always had some good tech reporting. I can remember reading Fast Forward, a magazine-like insert, every Thursday, and this was in the mid '90's. They have some great technology columnists (Rob Pegararo's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/technology/columns/fastforward/">blog still carries the Fast Forward name</a>) and were somewhat ahead of the curve on tech issues from a DC perspective.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>This doesn't change much, though. TechCrunch is still about technology companies, especially startups. It takes a much more hard-nosed approach to pick through how the rest of the stuff that goes on here, and the stuff the companies that TechCrunch covers can collide in horrible and unintended ways.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Either way, not an awful idea, although <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/08/AR2008050802002.html">Michael wishes there were comments on the WashPost end of the site.</a></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>One step at a time...</div><div><br /></div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/michael-arrington-is-no-carl-b.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/michael-arrington-is-no-carl-b.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">DC</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">New Media</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Technology</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">fast forward</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">michael arrington</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">rob pegararo</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">techcrunch</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">washington post</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">washpost</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:15:09 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Court dismisses Low Power Broadcasters challenge to Converter Box program, LPTV broadcasters want help going digital.</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><br /></div><div>In an update to <a href="http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/03/dtv-converter-boxes-illegally.html">a story we first reported on March 26th</a>, the <a href="http://capitolvalley.net/CBAvsFCC.pdf">petition</a> filed by the <a href="http://www.dtvnow.org/">Community Broadcasters Association</a> to halt the DTV Converter Box program's sale of boxes without "analog pass-through"  was <a href="http://capitolvalley.net/dtvorder.pdf">dismissed yesterday in an unsigned opinion</a> by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>The CBA is composed of Low Power TV and Class A stations, which are not required to be carried by cable television providers in their communities and are viewed over the air. However, unlike the major broadcast stations (which the cable companies are required to carry), these stations are not required by law to make the switch to Digital Television technology next February. The converter box program provides coupons for equipment to enable households to use their existing television sets to view the digital signals after the transition date, but does not require the boxes to have a "pass-through" mechanism which would allow the viewing of the remaining analog signals from the CBA's member broadcasters. </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Although the specifications for coupon-eligible boxes allow for the option of such a mechanism, the CBA noted today in a <a href="http://capitolvalley.net/cbarelease58.pdf">press release</a> that not a single converter box with a "pass-through" is available on store shelves, and that their petition for a declaratory ruling on the legality of the offending converter boxes remains before the FCC, although it has not yet been assigned a docket number.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>However, there is an alternative should the converter box program go ahead as planned. In their release and according to lead counsel <a href="http://fhhlaw.com/attorney_p_tannenwald.asp">Peter Tannenwald</a> of <a href="http://fhhlaw.com">Fletcher, Heald and Hildreth,</a> the CBA would seek funds from Congress to expand to all LPTV and Class A stations an existing program which facilitates a switch to DTV technology by a very limited number of LPTV broadcasters in very small communities. This alternative, according to both the CBA's release and Tannenwald, would allow the transition to take place smoothly and provide another solution to the problem.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>LPTV and Class A TV stations and translators are widely viewed by rural and language minority households,  which the FCC has identified as "priority targets" for consumer education efforts during the DTV Transition process, according to testimony by FCC Chairman Kevin Martin at a recent heading before the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: underline; ">Update 5:25pm 5/8/08:</span> </span>We spoke to CBA Lead Counsel Peter Tannenwald about the Court's decision and the CBA's plans. <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Correction: when I first refer to the petition for a declaratory ruling before the Court, I should have referred to it as a petition for a </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">writ of mandamus.</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;"> The petition for a declaratory ruling is before the FCC, not the Court.</span></div><div><br />
<embed src="http://btre.blogtalkradio.com/74_111010.mp3" width="300" height="42" type="audio/mpeg" autostart="false" loop="false" controller="true" bgcolor="#FF9900"> </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/court-dismisses-low-power-broa.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/court-dismisses-low-power-broa.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">DTV</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">All-Channel Receiver Act of 1962</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">all channels receiver act</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Community Broadcasters Association</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">converter box</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">dtv</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">dtv transition</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">fcc</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ntia</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">peter tannewald</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:23:08 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Facebook takes the &quot;MySpace&quot; approach on child safety, CNN makes up stuff.</title>
            <description><![CDATA[This wouldn't be Capitol Valley without an occasional Facebook post. <div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Recent feature creeping and gaffes have led some early-adopters and users to complain that the  social networking site, originally targeted to college students, has become "just like MySpace."</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Today, they have another reason to say they're right.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/05/08/facebook.safeguards.ap/index.html">As reported by CNN,</a> Facebook has entered into agreements with Attorneys General from 49 states (and the District of Columbia), under which they will introduce over 40 new "features" to address alleged problems of child predators on the site, cyberbullying, and other issues, as well as create a task force to "better verify users ages and identities."</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 12px; line-height: 15px; ">"Building a safe and trusted online experience has been part of <a href="http://topics.cnn.com/topics/facebook_inc" class="cnnInlineTopic" style="color: rgb(0, 66, 118); text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold; ">Facebook</a> from its outset," said Chris Kelly, Facebook's chief privacy officer. "The attorneys general have shown great leadership in helping to address the critical issue of Internet safety, and we commend them for continuing to set high standards for all players in the online arena."</span></blockquote><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div>
Not to rain on anyone's parade here, but Facebook <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">had</span> a fantastic way of verifying identities. Before opening the site to the general public, one signed on with an address from a verified network, to which your identify could be traced. <div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>In abandoning their original strategy of connecting people online based on existing offline social networks, such as colleges and workplaces, Facebook put themselves in the same trap that MySpace was already in. In essence, this was a problem of their own making. </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Now, a quick slap at CNN's coverage:</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 12px; line-height: 15px; ">MySpace, Facebook and other online networks have created a new venue for sexual predators, who often lie about their age to lure young victims to chat, share images and sometimes meet in person. It also has spawned cyberbullies, who have sent threatening and anonymous messages to other users, sometimes classmates and others they know.</span></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 12px; line-height: 15px;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></span></blockquote>Are these actual facts? Is that news, or opinion? Any new communications system can be considered a "new venue" once it reaches critical mass, and cyberbullying dates back to AOL's glory days. Perhaps CNN could have at least backed up these bold assertions with a call to <a href="http://pewinternet.org">the Pew Internet and American Life Project</a> which has done several excellent studies on those subjects.<div> </div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/facebook-takes-the-myspace-app.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/facebook-takes-the-myspace-app.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Facebook</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">MySpace</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cnn</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cyberbullying</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">facebook</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">myspace</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:17:52 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>GTA IV Sells a Bazillion Copies - Won&apos;t Someone Think of the Children!</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>By now I think that everyone knows that Grand Theft Auto IV is officially the most successful video game (in it's first week) in the history of the universe.&nbsp; Really.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here are some figures, from a <a href="http://cnn.com/TECH">CNN.com</a> article by <a href="http://www.gametap.com">GameTap</a></p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p>It's official. Grand Theft Auto IV is a video game blockbuster, with gamers around the world buying up more than 6 million copies of the gritty, urban action title in its first week of sales. </p>
<p>...</p>
<p _extended="true">Sales of the game generated more than half a billion dollars, the publisher, Take-Two Interactive, said.</p>
<p _extended="true">&nbsp;</p></blockquote>
<p dir="ltr" _extended="true">That's 2% of the <strong>entire country</strong>.&nbsp; Grand Theft Auto, as a series, has been the focal point of every anti-video game organization and nut-ball who wants to get them banned.&nbsp; People like the lovely Jack Thompson wanted to take legal action to prevent sales of the game to minors.&nbsp; It's obvious that Jackie boy has too much time on his hands, because there are two major things that make such a suit unneccessary: the <strong>voluntary </strong>rating system and parental responsibility.</p>
<p dir="ltr" _extended="true">More after the jump...</p>
<p dir="ltr" _extended="true">&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/gta-iv-sells-a-bazillion-copie.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/gta-iv-sells-a-bazillion-copie.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">All</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">CNN</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">GameTap</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Grand Thefty Auto</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">GTA IV</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Jack Thompson</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Parental Responsibility</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Rockstar Games</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Take Two</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Video Games</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:15:46 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comcast-Vuze not Over, Wireless Carriers Take Notice</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Did I call that or what? CTIA - The Wireless Association has<a href="http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&amp;id_document=6519841180"> filed comments before the FCC</a> <div>in the Comcast-Vuze tiff over...you guessed it, "reasonable network management."</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><a href="http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/who-says-google-wasnt-trying-t.html">As I reported yesterday,</a> the rules for the 700mhz "open access" have a "reasonable network management" clause, which unlike the Internet Policy Statement, is past of the Code of Federal Regulations, We openly wondered whether the FCC would use that as a way to define it, and if anyone noticed.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Now we know. CTIA noticed, and they're coming in on behalf of Comcast.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>I wonder why.</div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/comcastvuze-not-over-wireless.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/comcastvuze-not-over-wireless.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Net Neutrality</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">700mhz auction</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">bittorrent</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">comcast</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">comcast-vuze</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ctia</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">net neutrality</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">network management</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">open access</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vuze</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:38:06 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Sprint - Not so Together with Nextel?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Thank you, Reuters for the info - <br /><br /><blockquote>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Sprint Nextel Corp is considering spinning off or selling its Nextel unit, The Wall Street
Journal reported on Monday, quoting people familiar with the situation.<br /><br /></blockquote>Well, this would certainly be the easiest way for Sprint to abandon its iDEN network.&nbsp; It makes sense to sell of the Nextel part of Sprint Nextel as a quick(er) and (relatively) easy way to solve the concerns of trying to merge two incompatible networks.&nbsp; They could potentially give current iDEN users the option of getting into a CDMA device on the cheap or moving over to the new provider.&nbsp; Of course, that's if the new owner actually maintains the network for consumers.&nbsp; If one potential buyer gets his way (which is of course <b>if </b>Sprint decides to sell) the network could become a new haven for public safety organizations.<br /><br /><blockquote>The report said Cyren Call, a company founded by Nextel founder <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan_E._O%27Brien">Morgan
O'Brien</a>, is trying to assemble a consortium of investors to acquire
Nextel.<br /><br /></blockquote>Cyren's mission is to provide better communication for the nation's First Responders so that they can better react and communicate.<br /><br />Bottom line?&nbsp; My lay opinion is that selling off Nextel would give Sprint much-needed cash as well as the ability to focus solely on improving the CDMA network and building out WiMax without the distraction of trying to figure out how to integrate the iDEN users as well.<br /><br />Strangely absent from any buyout rumors is SouthernLINC.&nbsp; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Linc">SouthernLINC Wireless</a> is a regional iDEN carrier.&nbsp; In fact, their handsets are identical to Nextel's iDEN handsets.&nbsp; It would make sense for Sprint to offer them a sweetheart deal to take iDEN off their hands.&nbsp; Selling to SouthernLINC would be great for customers on both sides:&nbsp; Nextel customers would notice almost zero change except for the name on their bill and SouthernLINC would leap onto the national stage and become, almost overnight, a major player.&nbsp; If they could extend their reputation for reliability (they were back up and running only 72 hours post-Katrina) onto the national stage...Verizon's claim to fame would be in serious jeopardy.<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/sprint-not-so-together-with-ne.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/sprint-not-so-together-with-ne.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">All</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Mobile Phones</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">CDMA</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Cell Phone</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Cyren Call</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">iDEN</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mobile Phone</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Nextel</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Reuters</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">SouthernLINC</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Sprint</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Sprint Nextel</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:51:12 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Enough with the reruns, Mr. Chairman! New Episodes, now! Wireless! Broadband! Plot twists! (can someone get Dick Wolf as a speechwriter?)</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Ok, so yesterday I posted the <a href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/cmte_mtgs/110-ti-hrg.050608.Witness.List.pdf">witness list</a> for today's <a href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/membios/schedule.shtml">Net Neutrality/Broadband hearing.</a> I could have woken up at 5am to beat the line standers and get a seat with the lobbyists who pay people to stand in line for them in the halls of the Rayburn building, but I didn't. <div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div>I could be listening on the Audio Webcast. I tuned in for about 10 minutes, and haven't been impressed yet. I've got other projects, other things to work on, so I'm listening but my attention has not been caught. Why? Have you ever turned on your favorite TV show expecting a new episode and instead getting a rerun, or worse yet, a 3 hour extended version of American Idol? You know what you'll be seeing and hearing. No surprises, nothing to discuss with your friends. Just the same, this hearing, despite a few new faces, was a rerun in a series over the past year or so, including a few at the FCC. <div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>We know who the players are and what the plot will be. I'd rather just spend my time working on the things that I can't predict than sit through hours of talking, when instead I can read my good friend <a href="http://drewclark.com">Drew Clark</a> or Andrew Noyes' <a href="http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com">(of Tech Daily Dose/CongressDaily fame),</a> aka "That Other Andrew (tm)" or one of his colleagues write an excellent summary of what I already know is going to happen. Just think about this...</div><div><div><br /></div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/enough-with-the-reruns-mr-chai.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/enough-with-the-reruns-mr-chai.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Broadband</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Congress</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FCC</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Google</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Net Neutrality</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Rants</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Telecommunications</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Wireless</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">700mhz</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">broadband</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">broadband census</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">christian coalition</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">comcast</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ed markey</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">free press</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">google</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">howard berman</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">john conyers</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">john dingell</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">kevin martin</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">national broadband strategy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">net neutrality</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">network management</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">PRO-IP</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Reasonable Network Management</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">verizon</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:35:02 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>I&apos;m on TV Wednesday (sort of)</title>
            <description><![CDATA[It's not TV...it's <a href="http://jonnygoldstein.com">Jonny's Par-Tay</a> hosted by my friend Jonny Goldstein.<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><center><a href="http://johnnygoldstein.com"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2011/2467552925_87facd44a4.jpg" /></a></center><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div>My fellow guest is an interesting guy who writes about the East Coast startup scene, and I can't wait to meet him. I'm going to talk about "tech policy" whatever that means. I'm just here to entertain, I swear. You guys can join in on uStream too. I'll post more details tomorrow, but we go live at 9PM Eastern Time this Wednesday.<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Come heckle me!</div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/im-on-tv-wednesday-sort-of.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/im-on-tv-wednesday-sort-of.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Capitol Valley Media</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">andrew feinberg</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">jimmy gardner</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">jonny&apos;s par-tay</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">jonny goldstein</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">privacy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">scott stead</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">tech policy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">videocasting</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 01:50:40 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>&quot;It&apos;s our money, shut up.&quot; Why Cox can take a gamble on going Wireless.</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div>Om Malik <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/05/cox-wireless-broadband/">wrote about this earlier,</a> specifically that Cox has a hardware manufacturer lined up for its' network-to-be:</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; ">Cox Communications is one cable company that is wasting no time and embracing wireless. Cox's wireless subsidiary, Cox Wireless, spent around $304 million and snatched up 14 Block A and eight Block B licenses as part of the recently concluded 700 spectrum auctions. Now, there is word that the company has given the contract to build the network to Chinese equipment maker, Huawei. UBS Research in a note to its clients notes that, Huawei is going to supply CDMA gear for a wireless network.</span></blockquote></blockquote><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>That's not the big story. What's big is that Cox, alone among its' peers, has a huge advantage going into the coming battle for next-generation Wireless consumers.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>While Comcast, Time-Warner and Charter (through Paul Allen's Vulcan) bid on, and won, licenses, building a new network is a big deal for a company with huge amounts of infrastructure to maintain. In a market (700Mhz) where Verizon has already won the "top dog" blocks, shareholders might get angry, especially if an operator bungles the venture.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Not Cox. Remember, they're owned entirely by one family. Cox Enterprises, Inc. is a <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">totally private operation</span>. Even their Cable company, which once was publicly traded has all of its' shares ultimately by CEI after the Cox family took it private several years ago.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><a href="http://lists.fiercemarkets.com/c.html?rtr=on&amp;s=69l,yzh5,238p,26rl,2jqg,23h4,cq5z">According to this survey,</a> consumers would buy wireless service from their cable company if they could. Cox has a market lock and a good reputation in its' core communities, where, coincidentally, it won the most spectrum.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Consider that unlike Charter or Comcast, which have a fiduciary duty to not waste their stockholders' money, Cox's only shareholder that matters is Barbara Cox Anthony, the mother of CEO James Cox Kennedy.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>When you're playing with your family's money and you have home turf advantage, swinging for the fences isn't a bad idea. If Cox can carve out a role for itself, perhaps Verizon will feel the heat, especially since most wireless customers stay within a geographic region and aren't nationwide travelers all the time. </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>With some luck, Cox could shake things up. Verizon vs Google isn't the only exciting story in this.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/its-our-money-shut-up-why-cox.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/its-our-money-shut-up-why-cox.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Cable</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Wireless</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">700mhz</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barbara Cox Anthony</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cable</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Cox Communications</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Cox Enterprises</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">James Cox Kennedy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Verizon</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">wireless</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 13:13:46 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Google to Verizon - &quot;play by the rules&quot;; could the FCC be ready to define Net Neutrality through the back door?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[If not, they're sure putting up a good fight. IP Democracy has a great post about G<a href="http://www.ipdemocracy.com/archives/2008/05/05/#002975">oogle's petition, filed with the FCC to effectively deny Verizon's bid.</a> <div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><a href="http://www.ipdemocracy.com/googlepetitiontodeny.pdf">Here's the PDF. </a></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>To sum up, Google isn't too happy about Verizon's "description" of their "Open Access" plan, which they pretty much call an end-run around the requirements of the auction:</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">Ver<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Georgia; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; ">izon has taken the public position that it may exclude its handsets from the open access condition. Verizon believes it may force customers who want to access the open platform using a device not purchased from Verizon to go through "Door No. 1," while allowing customers who obtain their device from Verizon access through "Door No. 2." As Google previously made clear, Verizon's position would completely reverse the meaning of the rule such that the open access condition would apply to none of Verizon's customers, and thereby render the condition a nullity. Because this "two-door" position espoused by Verizon is contrary to the plain meaning of the rule, as well as the Commission's public interest findings and policy objectives set forth in the 700 MHz Second R&amp;O, it must be rejected.</span></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Georgia; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></span></blockquote></blockquote>Fairly straightforward. Verizon can't allow "special access" for  applications by their own customers while denying it to others. How clear could the plain meaning of the auction rules be? I thought it was pretty clear what the Commission wanted: an open platform. <div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Considering Verizon has already tried to nullify Open Access in Court, and that CTIA (their trade association) is still trying to do so, isn't it obvious they have no intention of playing by the rules?</div><div><br /></div><div>I thought the FCC was rather straightforward in the auction rules:</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Times"><span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica"> </span><i>700 MHz Second R&amp;O</i>, at ¶206 ("Specifically, a C Block<span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica"> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times; ">licensee may not block, degrade, or interfere with the ability of end users to download and utilize<span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica"> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times; ">applications of their choosing on the licensee'sCBlocknetwork,subject to reasonable network management.").<span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica"> </span></span></span></span></span></p><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></span></div>
</blockquote>Reasonable Network Management? Hmm. Where have we heard that term before? Seeing as Comcast-Vuze is settled and the Commission yet had a chance to define Reasonable Network Management (despite their recent hearings), does anyone else see the importance of them using the <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">exact same phrase</span> that they use in the Internet Policy Statement?<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Clearly, the Commissioners are smart enough to realize that the 700Mhz network will be part of a next-generation Internet backbone, and they are going to hold Wireless providers to the same standard as "wireline" broadband, such as Cable, DSL and Fiber. </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>(forgetting, of course, that K-Mart wants to let the Telecoms keep their walled gardens for now by denying Skype's petition to apply Carterfone to existing networks)</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Could this Verizon-Google tiff force the Commission's hand on Net Neutrality as a whole? </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Consider: "Reasonable Network Management" is now an official term used in the CFR. They'll have to define it at some point. </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Anyone want to place bets that Comcast weighs in on this?</div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/who-says-google-wasnt-trying-t.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/05/who-says-google-wasnt-trying-t.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Wireless</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">700mhz</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Any Device Any Application</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Auction</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">CTIA</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">DC Circuit</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FCC</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Google</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">kevin martin</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Open Access</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Verizon</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 12:53:09 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
