Recently in Social Media Category

So a few months ago, I talked to Robert Scoble about why today's Web 2.0 world doesn't "get" Washington. 463's Sean Garrett totally nailed it in a blog post a few months ago, too, right around when I went into Radio Silence (more on that below). Robert said he wanted to learn more about the issue, and we talked more about it at SXSW. He said he wanted to come check this place out for himself, and I was happy to oblige

Anyway, for the past five months, Julie Barko Germany (of G.W.'s Institute for Politics and Democracy on the Internet) and I have been knocking on doors, making calls and talking to talking heads and pretty much seeing how we can get Robert (and his audience) a geek's-eye view of why DC isn't as easy to operate in as the SIlicon Valley. Why can't Net Neutrality legislation get passed? Do politicians really think the Internet is a Series of Tubes?

Things like that.

Meanwhile, throw another wrinkle into the mix. Some of you may have noticed I haven't been blogging much. Part of it has been because I've been planning stuff. The other is that I've been writing about pretty much the same stuff (tech policy) for a place that actually publishes daily newsletters devoted to the same, and it's not exactly good to compete with your employer. I also have agreed to maintain  objectivity, and so while I learn the "journalism" game I've been playing it "safe" and leaving the tech policy space up to Andrew Noyes (who I really have to thank many times over for helping me get my foot in the door, and who I still owe some drinks to) and Sean.

So, where are we? I've been MIA off learning the Tao and Zen of Objectivity (which really isn't that hard, considering I've had some great teachers) and stealthily planning this Geek Attack on DC. And, it's happening. Finally.

We're on. Julie and I will be helping Robert turn his lens on this fair city next week, with a swing by Personal Democracy Forum on Monday, followed by some days on the Hill and with other policy gurus. We're scheduled to talk with some heavy hitters. Some may come through, others may not. Even more may jump in. Either way, the idea is to give him (and all his readers out in the tech space) a perspective on what this place is all about.

For instance, Congress is full of people whose lives are scheduled by other people in 15 minute intervals. We're going to be rushing around, alot. It's not ideal, and it'll make for some tough going, but you know what? Everyone involved is going to learn something new, we hope.

Also, we're throwing a little party on Wednesday night.

Many people need to be (and will be) thanked over the next few days as I document this.

Oh, and for those who have been wondering what I've been up to? I suggest a subscription to Washington Internet Daily.



Posted to Capitol Valley Media | Personal | Politics | Social Media | Technology
Playing around with Seesmic during Twitter's downtime today, I couldn't help but feel much more superficial recording, and re-recording videos trying to get them just right, just like I do every day with writing.

Here's a question. The Kennedy-Nixon debate of 1960 is a pivotal moment in the history of TV as well as politics. Remember, people who listened on radio thought Nixon won, but TV viewers judged JFK the winner.

As videoblogging enters the mainstream, is the social media sphere going to become as superficial as TV is? Is the quality of the debate going to decline?

The beauty of what blogs have done for media and our national conversations is they've allowed ideas to take precedence over production and presentation. I fear that the emergence of video may hurt that marketplace of ideas.

Thoughts?
Posted to Social Media
There's some interesting talk on how different generations view and use social media, focusing on Gen-X, Boomers, and "Millennials" (god I HATE THAT TERM).

Life cycles: Boomers - indulged in secure environment. Come of age, rail against the "moral decrepititude" of the world, emerge with a values discussion (Reagan?), and "shine in elderhood".

(pictures are on Flickr, by the way).

Peer personality of Boomers - values, vision and religion.

Gen-X - abandonded as children, competitive as adolescence, in elderhood, slow the pace of social change...I'm not sure how I feel about this. All about "protecting society." 

Millenials are "special" children, very team-oriented, but increasingly "protected" by adults. As young adults are "can-do heroes" and take on BIG challenges.

(this is all generational language, means absolutely nothing, speaker says)

Book suggestion: "Millennials Rising" and "Fourth Turning"


We're just going to talk about Millennials, Gen-X, and Boomers.

Question about Obama/Clinton and Social Media...I need to field this one.


Gen-X: all about survival. Not trusting institutions. They like information that is vetted through a person, such as a traditional source (seeding), but transmitted peer-to-peer.

FYI - Boomers were railing against their grandparents, not their parents. Is she sure?

"Wisdom of using social media is using the world view of your target market."

This is crap. I'm done with this. I'm going to challenge the hell out of this.

This woman's view of social media politics is so viewed through a Gen-X prism. Has she read ANY of Amanda Lenhart's studies?
Posted to PodCampDC | Social Media

Days to DTV transition

Change Congress


Archives

Subscribe in a reader