Recently in SXSW Category

As a native Washingtonian, I know the value of a good business card exchange. It's almost a ritual here, as well as at most conferences and networking events I attend.

I don't know if I'm behind the times, but after my "conference hell month" I've got about 400 business cards I still need to scan and some to reply to. I should buy a scanner.

However, some of them I'm putting at the bottom of the pile:

    1. If you handed me a "moocard," one of those tiny little calling cards sold using your flickr photos, you've immediately gone to to the bottom of the pile. Why? They're not real cards. They're not useful to me. They don't tell me enough about you for me to remember you, and they all look pretty much alike.

    2. If you hand me a double-sided, glossy business card with no white space, you lose points. Why? Part of the beauty of business cards, is that with a pen, I can write things on them, like how, when, or where I met you, if we have a mutual friend, or anything else that would make me pick your card out of the stack and possibly do something important. When you have shiny, dark colored cards, I can't write on them. You remove a valuable avenue for making your cards a tool, not just something to gawk at. It may look cool, but it's useless to me as a networking facilitator.

    3. Cutesy cards with company-related graphics and logos are ok. Double-sided cards are ok. However, if you must go that far, please, please, please, please have at least one side with some space that I could write on. I cannot stress this enough. When I get home at the end of the day, or even when I make a card exchange (an art in and of itself) I write things down, like the date or event, so I can better mentally sort through who you are, especially at somewhere like SXSW where I came away with 250 cards in 4 days. If you want to be remembered, make it easy. Plus, someone might want to write a note to themselve that they really, really want to do business with you. Make sure there is a place for them to write.

    4. It's ok to be creative, but remember that your card is a tool for helping people remember you, and leaves a lasting impression of how "serious" you are. A quick look at my stack reveals that the vast majority of people who would be considered "important" or that I made a point of getting back to first had uncluttered, easy to read cards with ample writing space, communicated the basic information (name, title contact info) and were generally devoid of clutter, gloss, or garish color schemes. If you had these things, they had better be enough to make me remember you.

    5. If you're going to be creative, be really, really creative. Check out the SXSW Card Collective for examples of the good, the bad, the ugly, and the creative (in a good way).

 

FYI, Here's mine:

andrewfeinberg.jpg

 

Robert Scoble's is awesome, and has enough white space to still be useful. Best of both worlds.

 

robert-scoble.jpg
Is that person happy or horrified? I can't tell.
 
And the winner: Lots of white space, and interactive! Joshua Strebel, of the Unicorn Panel fame:
jshua.png

Back to tech/politics later. I hear there's an Energy bill around.

Posted to Rants | SXSW | Social Networking
...if your job title is something like:

  1. Social Media Consultant
  2. Social Media Manager
  3. Online Talent Manager

Rubel makes the point that alot of these jobs are simply extensions of existing professions in advertising and public relations. I tend to agree. In fact, I see these "online niche" positions migrating to a bigger role in the public space. 

I'm not sure if it was Dr. Adam Conner, PhD (D-Facebook) or Patrick Ruffini that said (at SXSW) that tomorrow's political campaigns will be run by people who know online media, not just pollsters, but I think they're right. What is now a niche profession will become part of mainstream media, and expertise in "new media" will just become part of learning how to market in general, be it a candidate, a product, or a band.

So, if you've made your career path trying to find the next "big thing" in social networking, maybe you should broaden the resume a bit. Knowing new technology is good, but make sure you're grounded in solid skills.

Next, Steve says he's going to talk about careers that will stay relevant. I'd like to see what he thinks.

Posted to Economy | SXSW | Social Networking | Technology
Posted to SXSW | SXSWi
...not what you're thinking. 

Andrew Hyde (of VCWear, Startup Weekend and the Unicorn Panel) pitches Guy Kawasaki...


Elevator Pitching Guy Kawasaki from Andrew on Vimeo.
Posted to SXSW | SXSWi

I first met Shashi Bellamkonda on the second floor of Six last Friday. I'm pretty outgoing when surrounded by like-minded people, but I was absolutely blown away by the sheer friendliness and warmth of this person, who turned out to work for what is to some people a great boogeyman of the 'net: Network Solutions.

I wasn't quite sure how to handle this, nor did I understand how his title, "Social Networking Swami" fit into the culture there, which is sometimes derided as cutthroat and anti-consumer.

On the other hand, Shel Israel, best known for his collaboration with Robert Scoble wrote a fantastic blog post/interview that sheds a ton of light onto why this guy is so cool and how one employee can change a company at the right place and time. Money quote:

The day when a company could communicate hiding behind walls and lobbing stuff over the wall to customers is over. My new position at Network Solutions will work toward empowering our customers to carry on conversations using social media. Companies always want to listen to their customers and are accountable to their customers.

I am already looking forward to meeting this guy again, and again.
Posted to Internet | SXSW | Social Networking | Technology | Telecommunications | Twitter
check the Flickr stream...

Includes the Zuckerberg keynote, parties, etc...
Posted to All | SXSW
Alex and I will be live, for one hour, tonight at 10:30 PM EST / 7:30 PM PST. We'll talk about SXSWi, how awesome we are, and how cool anyone who listens to us is. Also other stuff.

Posted to Capitol Valley Media | Podcasts | SXSW | SXSWi
DSC_0011.JPGDSC_0015.JPGDSC_0086.JPGDSC_0004.JPG 

So, South by South West Interactive was, by many measures, a huge success. There were a record number of attendees, many fantastic parties and a now-infamous "train wreck" of a keynote interview of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg thanks to Business Week's Sara Lacy. There were even appearances by Judge Dredd and a talking Unicorn. 

The panels were by and large excellent. Some I missed, like the presentation by the LOLCATZ guys and Michael Eisner's spirited defense of copyrights, but many that I saw were fantastic, like the "worst website ever" awards and the "bankrupt your startup" panel. There were even some with a great deal of substance, like the panels on music piracy, online safety, the "Friend me, Vote for me, Donate Now!" panel, and the New Media panel that closed out the conference for me.

SXSW is almost like a red carpet event for "internet celebrity" watchers. Where else can you catch Mark Zuckerberg, Robert Scoble, and the I Can Has Cheezburger guy in the same room? Mark Cuban even showed up to a party last night. 

But, I have to burst the bubble. Something was missing. Lots of optimism and enthusiasm, not enough critical eyes on the problems ahead. Was the media covering SXSW responsible? Partially. We had some opportunities to ask tough questions, like when Scoble asked Zuckerberg about data portability and moving his contacts to Outlook. The perfect follow-up would have been to as why Facebook removed that feature in the first place. I remember the feature, and to be honest, I was so focused on getting good photos that my question was weak in comparison. I could have asked the Media Defender CEO about his company's bankruptcy problems, but instead wanted to know about proposed laws and business models. We should have asked tougher questions of those who needed questioning. 

Some blame also lies with the conference organizers. Why was there not a single panel on Net Neutrality or the U.S.'s dismal record of broadband penetration? I know that many of the panels were voted on by registrants months ago, but why no "sponsored panels" on issues that when you get down to it, affect every single company that presented at SXSW?

In the last panel I saw on New Media, there wasn't a single mention of the Comcast-Vuze issue, despite the rep from Kyte TV on the panel. Coincidentally, NBC/Fox's Hulu service launched last night. I'm waiting for a review from Alex on it. Kyte, Seesmic, Qik, all of these video service providers rely on the providers of the pipes, be they Comcast, Verizon, Cox, Qwest, etc.Do they not believe that they could evolve into a threat? 

Lots of talk about wireless applications, but not a single mention of the 700mhz auction going on and how open access will affect the wireless content industry. If kids today want everything on their phones, why isn't there an interest in how content will reach those phones? It's a big deal, and as I go through my massive stack of business cards, I hope to talk to some people about it.

I know that SXSW isn't a purely technical, political, or normal conference of any sort...but what I also know is that when enough industry leaders get together, there are things that need to be talked about, and for the most part, they weren't.

I hope next year is different, before it's too late.


Posted to SXSW | SXSWi
DSC_0012.JPG
I'm sitting in a panel featuring Daniel Graf from Kyte TV, Eric Steuer from Creative Commons, Carlton Evans from The Moxie Institute, and Robert Scoble of FastCompany.tv.

Money quote from Scoble: "the best advertising is good content." 

It's interesting that Alex is writing about Hulu as I'm sitting here. When Old Media enters New Media, they generally want to keep control and keep people on their site. Another observation from Scoble was that when his old company, PodTech, enabled people to embed their content in their own web pages, the number of people viewing PodTech content skyrocketed. Getting your content out in today's world means giving up some degree of control, but that lack of control allows you to build an audience. 

Content really is king.

I asked the panel some questions about Hulu, the Berman bill, the fight for control of content, and government propping up industry, and here is what the Panel had to say:



We live in exciting times. 

I'm on my way back. Maybe some over-the-shoulder content from the airport, I still need to write up some stuff. 
Posted to Movies | Music | Net Neutrality | SXSW
DSC_0004.JPG


Randy Saaf, from Media Defender, makes his living distributing fake songs over P2P networks. You would think he knows a thing or two about legislation that affects the music industry. However, when I asked him about Howard Berman's copyright bill and if the government had any business propping up a business model, he had no idea what I was talking about. 

Either he's clueless, or he lied through his teeth.

I also spoke with Richard Wasylik, of Ricardo & Wasylik PL, an attorney who has defended people against RIAA litigation. Wasylik and I talk about things like he dangers of using government power to help one industry, the ex parte subpoena process, and the Howard Berman copyright bill.

Audio is below.
 

Photos on Flickr
Posted to Congress | Copyright | Music | SXSW

Days to DTV transition

Change Congress


Archives

Subscribe in a reader